Hub' tumblr
Exclamation: yourname@yahoo.com Can Be Yours!
By Jay Rossiter, SVP, Platforms
Over the last few months, we’ve made exciting changes to some of your favorite Yahoo! products, like Flickr, Mail, Weather, the Homepage and Search. Today, I’m excited to share with you our next big push: we want to give our loyal users and new folks the…
I wish gmail could do the same
At least Gmail is https by default, as they care. Unlike Yahoo!.
The Rise And Fall Of Kodak
Great stuff by Kenny Suleimanagich. A few things of note. First:
At its peak, in 1996, Kodak was rated the fourth-most-valuable global brand. That year, the company had about two-thirds of the global photo market, annual revenues of $16 billion, and a market capitalization of $31 billion.
Today, Kodak trades around twelve cents a share. Its market cap is roughly $32 million. Yes, “million” with an “m”.
How will it be saved going forward?:
Among other things, Kodak CEO Antonio M. Perez is betting his commercial-printing business on high-volume customers who need a lot of ink, like product-packaging manufacturers. Even if this latest “pivot” is successful — and a lot of people think it’s a stretch — the company would be reduced to helping other people make the boxes used to ship the devices that will take the photographs of the future.
Sad.
In the 1980s, one Kodak engineer, impressed by the then-new Macintosh II computer, began making proposals for Kodak to move into the digital realm. By the late 80s, the company had already made a four megapixel sensor — and did nothing with it. Why? As former Wired editor Chris Anderson puts it:
“Who could afford that?” Anderson fired back, unimpressed. “Macs were really expensive. Computing technology couldn’t have kept up until much later.”
Finally, as a reminder that some of the most transformative things start as pure gimmicks, consider the original George Eastman patent from the late 1800s:
In his original patent, he wrote that his improvements applied to “that class of photographic apparatus known as ‘detective cameras,’ ” — concealed and disguised devices, made possible by a new wave of miniaturization, that were used mostly for a lowbrow entertainment: snapping pictures of people unaware. Cameras equipped with single-use chemical plates were hidden in opera glasses, umbrellas, and other everyday objects, and sharing the surreptitious, random, and sometimes compromising photos that resulted became a popular fad. Eastman, in other words, was obsessively tinkering with what many people at the time would have considered a cheap novelty or a toy. Like Netflix in its early days, Kodak relied on the U.S. Postal Service: Customers sent their spent cameras to Rochester, where the film was removed, processed, and cut into frames; the resulting negatives and prints, along with the camera, reloaded with a fresh roll of film, were returned to the sender. Suddenly it was easy for anyone to take lots of pictures, and Eastman’s new business became a juggernaut almost overnight.
Everyone out there: keep tinkering.
McCurry after Kodachrome: “I don’t use film anymore” | Damiano Fedeli
Sometime the medium is everything.
Fortunately Steve McCurry hasn’t stopped photographing.
Stella Bella Blue puppy, day 1 on Flickr.
Via Flickr:
Stella Bella Blue on her first day in her new home.
The Development of the C Language, by Dennis M. Ritchie (via conundrum)
C is a portable Macro-Assembler. Has always been.
(via conundrum)
Holding the flag on Flickr.
Via Flickr:
Protester hold a flag on top of the statue in front of the Vancouver Art Gallery during Occupy Vancouver Day 2.
Aligned on Flickr.
Via Flickr:
Burnaby Masonic cemetery during a Vancouver Flickr Gang photowalk.
Forgot to post this photo I took in April- - I’ve been shooting Ricoh GRDs since 2009- and I am currently on my 4th body, a GRDIII. The first two GRDII’s that I owned simply wore out after two years and died. The third, a GRDIII took a fall and konked out with a busted screen and even worse autofocus issues. Like the film GR bodies, they are relatively fragile cameras that require care. After the first one I should have probably gone with a Capilio 500G.
You can see why I’m not too keen on ever investing in a digital Leica- or any digital camera with a price tag over $200…
Mine (GRDII) isn’t dead, but it has dust inside, highly visible on the pictures… Never seen that elsewhere, seems to be a Ricoh disease. :-(

